[flashrom] [PATCH] Include sys/glibc-syscalls.h instead of inexistent sys/io.h on Android.

[Stefan Tauner]

On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 20:49:19 +0100
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net> wrote:

> On 20.02.2016 11:23, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> > This won't make raw I/O work magically but at least it would provide iopl()
> > if some driver requires it and there is no better alternative currently.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner at alumni.tuwien.ac.at>
> > ---
> >  hwaccess.h | 10 ++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hwaccess.h b/hwaccess.h
> > index 29a29b0..f1ad807 100644
> > --- a/hwaccess.h
> > +++ b/hwaccess.h
> > @@ -203,8 +203,14 @@ cpu_to_be(64)
> >  
> >  /* sys/io.h provides iopl(2) and x86 I/O port access functions (inb, outb etc).
> >   * It is included in glibc (thus available also on debian/kFreeBSD) but also in other libcs that mimic glibc,
> > - * e.g. musl and uclibc. */
> > -#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__GLIBC__)
> > + * e.g. musl and uclibc. Because we cannot detect the clib or existence of the header or of the instructions
> 
> Please use "libc" instead of "clib".
> 
> 
> > + * themselves safely in here we need some heuristic below:
> > + * On Android we don't have the header and no way for I/O port access at all. However, sys/glibc-syscalls.h
> > + * refers to an iopl implementation and we therefore include at least that one for now. On non-Android we assume
> > + * that a Linux system's libc has a suitable sys/io.h or we depend on glibc to offer it. */
> > +#if defined(__ANDROID__)
> > +#include <sys/glibc-syscalls.h>
> > +#elif defined(__linux__) || defined(__GLIBC__)
> >  #include <sys/io.h>
> >  #endif
> >  
> 
> Apart from the comment above, this is
> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net>

Thanks, committed in r1932.
-- 
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner