[flashrom] Reporte LE25FU406B and LE25FU406B

Jose Luis León zenky1 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 9 22:05:04 CET 2015


Hi all, I am doing send logs that applied on chips:
SANYO LE25FU406B - http://chopapp.com/#7cvgvoav
SANYO LE25FU406C - http://chopapp.com/#zw01179t


too I attaching conversation of IRC channel.

I am using chopapp because pastebin failed :s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/attachments/20151109/0d5b391b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
menu
Status #flashromX
#flashrom: Welcome to #flashrom! | flashrom 0.9.8 is out! http://flashrom.org/Flashrom/0.9.8 | Please wait a bit for answers or mail flashrom at flashrom.org | Please do NOT log this channel! | flashrom output to http://paste.flashrom.org | http://www.flashrom.org/Easy_projects
[17:25] == Zenky [c834b3cd at gateway/web/freenode/ip.200.52.179.205] has joined #flashrom
[17:26] <Zenky> Hi, how I can add the chip Sanyo LE25FU406C to list compatiblity of flashrom?
[17:27] <idwer> LE25, is that a whole new family?
[17:27] <idwer> you do have the datasheet? :)
[17:28] <Zenky> in the flashrom 0.9.8 this Sanyo LE25FW106, LE25FW406A and LE25FU406B are compatibility
[17:28] <Zenky> look the last chip is version B
[17:28] <Zenky> but the version C not work :(
[17:28] <Zenky> they are exactly the same version B and C
[17:29] <Zenky> I have the datasheet of version B
[17:29] <Zenky> LE25FU406B
[17:30] <Zenky> but not the LE25FU406C :(
[17:30] <urjaman> so you have one of those to test with?
[17:31] <Zenky> yes
[17:31] <Zenky> I have one LE25FU406B and one LE25FU406C
[17:31] <Zenky> flasrom 0.9.8 can detect the version B
[17:31] <Zenky> but not the C
[17:31] <Zenky> he show me this information:
[17:32] <Zenky> No EEPROM/flash device found. Note: flashrom can never write if the flash chip isn't not found automatically
[17:32] <urjaman> you could start by reading (verbose log) what ID it gives and copy the definition for the B to C with the new ID ... then comes the harder part of figuring out if it actually work
[17:33] == night199uk [~night199u at kodi/staff/night199uk] has joined #flashrom
[17:34] <urjaman> i mean you could get lucky and it just works, but be prepared that they changed something ...
[17:34] <Zenky> ok, but I modified the file flashchips.c
[17:35] <Zenky> and recompiled
[17:35] <Zenky> adding information to version C
[17:35] <idwer> what's the device ID of this model?
[17:35] <idwer> guessing... 0x1f?
[17:35] <Zenky> I dont know :(
[17:36] <urjaman> probe for the 406B and use the -V flag so flashrom should print out the ID it responds with
[17:36] <Zenky> flashchips.c:10291:15: error SANYO_LE25FU406C undclared here (hot in a function)
[17:36] <Zenky> ok please wait a moment
[17:37] == dashcloud_ [~quassel at pool-71-246-26-193.phlapa.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
[17:39] <urjaman> flashrom -p <your programmer parms> -V -c LE25FU406B
[17:39] == dashcloud_ [~quassel at pool-71-246-26-193.phlapa.fios.verizon.net] has joined #flashrom
[17:41] <Zenky> probe_spi_res2: id1 0x62, id2 0x1e
[17:41] <Zenky> this id
[17:42] <urjaman> that looks like the 406B
[17:42] <urjaman> i meant to probe the 406C with that command ..
[17:43] <stefanct> it will be 6e according to my crystal ball
[17:43] <stefanct> and there would be a rdid with 0613
[17:43] <Zenky> Error: unknown chip LE25FU406C specified
[17:43] <Zenky> :(
[17:44] <urjaman> Zenky: say 406B, attach the programmer to 406C
[17:44] <urjaman> stefanct: how come? whats your crystal ball? :P
[17:44] <stefanct> or leave out the -c altogether and show us the full log
[17:44] <urjaman> yeah
[17:44] <stefanct> a japanese datasheet
[17:44] <Zenky> yes japanese datasheet :(
[17:45] <urjaman> i thought it would better highlight to him the reply line from the mess
[17:45] <stefanct> that's fine... the hex numbers are still arabic ;)
[17:45] <Zenky> the only difference is that you work at 40 Hz and the other at 30 and 50Hz
[17:45] <stefanct> urjaman: he should not have to ;)
[17:46] <urjaman> well yeah
[17:46] <Zenky> I know that, but not work :(
[17:46] <Zenky> No EEPROM/flash device found. Note: flashrom can never write if the flash chip isn't not found automatically
[17:46] <stefanct> Zenky: please just do a normal probe (no -V) but add -o probe.log and upload that file somewhere (pastebin)
[17:46] <stefanct> that's fine and expected
[17:46] <stefanct> we need to add support for the chip. for that we need a verbose log
[17:47] <Zenky> ok ok ok ok  thanks
[17:48] * urjaman will skip the teaching then
[17:48] <urjaman> to be fair, he asked "how I can"
[17:48] <Zenky> Guys I need retire :(, but I come back in 2 hrs, I will do the log and send you ok?
[17:49] <stefanct> yes, but i will be asleep then :)
[17:49] <urjaman> Zenky: send the link to pastebin here
[17:49] <Zenky> ok urjaman
[17:49] <stefanct> you can send it to flashrom at flashrom.org as well
[17:49] <Zenky> ok stefanct
[17:49] <stefanct> (our public mailing list)


More information about the flashrom mailing list