[flashrom] [PATCH] Unsignify lengths and addresses in chip functions and structs

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Am 22.11.2011 23:09 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
> (the buffer
> handling in) ft2232_spi.c is slightly awful :)
> various "bufs" (well, 2), some of them static (ok, only the one in
> send_command, but still this is messier than expected for such a
> simple driver), the two ~equivalent failed/ret variables in send_command
> etc. make it a bit unreadable.

Indeed, this file could use some cleanup.

 
> we need to check for failure of the buffer methods anyway, so i dont
> see a reason to do the size checks in the caller(s).
>
> i have reverted the whole file now, because i am not sure how to
> proceed and wanted to publish what i have. not much changed, but i had
> to rebase it due to the addition of the opaque framework and hwseq.
>
>> > […]
>> > With the above comments this is
>> > Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net>
> should i commit the attached version?

Please do, the ack is still valid.

I wonder whether we should enable the sign warnings once the cleanups
and remaining conversions are in. The big problem might be platform
(OS/library version) dependent changes which we don't know of, but OTOH
we won't know until we try it.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/