[flashrom] [PATCH 8/8] Added (N) to the name of MX29F002B/T devices.
Stefan Tauner
stefan.tauner at student.tuwien.ac.at
Wed Apr 20 22:45:31 CEST 2011
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:00:41 +0200
Idwer Vollering <vidwer at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/3/15 Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner at student.tuwien.ac.at>:
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner at student.tuwien.ac.at>
>
> Acked-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer at gmail.com>
>
> But *only* if the probe/read/erase/write status is not affected.
the only difference between the non-n version and the n version is,
that the reset pin of the n version is not connected.
do we even use the hardware reset? if not this should not change
anything.
ps: the difference between B and T is the (non-uniform) sector
structure
pps: i have a MX29F002NTPC-12, but i dont have any indication that i
have tested it for full PREW. there was a successful test for
MX29F001TPC-12 though on the ml (and i have submitted an already acked
patch for it). want me to test it "again"?
--
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner
More information about the flashrom
mailing list