[flashrom] [PATCH] Real partial writes

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Thu Oct 21 02:08:41 CEST 2010


On 21.10.2010 02:00, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>  On 20/10/10 05:06, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>> If you're going to test this, please be advised that I have not tested
>> execution, only compilation. Testing erase (and checking with a separate
>> readback that erase actually worked) and write (same test with separate
>> readback) would be highly appreciated. Verbose logs are even more
>> appreciated.
> Write seems work, but erase on its own doesn't. Some blocks aren't
> erased: (good = erased, bad = not erased)
>
> 0x000000-0x000fff, 0x001000-0x001fff, good
> 0x002000-0x002fff, bad
> 0x003000-0x003fff, 0x004000-0x004fff, 0x005000-0x005fff, good
> 0x006000-0x006fff, bad
> 0x007000-0x007fff, good
> 0x008000-0x008fff, bad

I suspect that there are more bugs in the code than I'd like. Please try
the patch below which has more debug output.

Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net>

Index: flashrom-partial_write_rolling_erase_write/flashrom.c
===================================================================
--- flashrom-partial_write_rolling_erase_write/flashrom.c	(Revision 1215)
+++ flashrom-partial_write_rolling_erase_write/flashrom.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -793,6 +793,7 @@
  * Check if the buffer @have can be programmed to the content of @want without
  * erasing. This is only possible if all chunks of size @gran are either kept
  * as-is or changed from an all-ones state to any other state.
+ *
  * The following write granularities (enum @gran) are known:
  * - 1 bit. Each bit can be cleared individually.
  * - 1 byte. A byte can be written once. Further writes to an already written
@@ -803,10 +804,12 @@
  *   this function.
  * - 256 bytes. If less than 256 bytes are written, the contents of the
  *   unwritten bytes are undefined.
+ * Warning: This function assumes that @have and @want point to naturally
+ * aligned regions.
  *
  * @have        buffer with current content
  * @want        buffer with desired content
- * @len         length of the verified area
+ * @len		length of the checked area
  * @gran	write granularity (enum, not count)
  * @return      0 if no erase is needed, 1 otherwise
  */
@@ -846,10 +849,102 @@
 				break;
 		}
 		break;
+	default:
+		msg_cerr("%s: Unsupported granularity! Please report a bug at "
+			 "flashrom at flashrom.org\n", __func__);
 	}
 	return result;
 }
 
+/**
+ * Check if the buffer @have needs to be programmed to get the content of @want.
+ * If yes, return 1 and fill in first_start with the start address of the
+ * write operation and first_len with the length of the first to-be-written
+ * chunk. If not, return 0 and leave first_start and first_len undefined.
+ *
+ * Warning: This function assumes that @have and @want point to naturally
+ * aligned regions.
+ *
+ * @have	buffer with current content
+ * @want	buffer with desired content
+ * @len		length of the checked area
+ * @gran	write granularity (enum, not count)
+ * @return	0 if no write is needed, 1 otherwise
+ * @first_start	offset of the first byte which needs to be written
+ * @first_len	length of the first contiguous area which needs to be written
+ *
+ * FIXME: This function needs a parameter which tells it about coalescing
+ * in relation to the max write length of the programmer and the max write
+ * length of the chip.
+ */
+static int get_next_write(uint8_t *have, uint8_t *want, int len,
+			  int *first_start, int *first_len,
+			  enum write_granularity gran)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	int i, j, limit;
+
+	/* The passed in variable might be uninitialized. */
+	*first_len = 0;
+	switch (gran) {
+	case write_gran_1bit:
+	case write_gran_1byte:
+		for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+			if (have[i] != want[i]) {
+				if (!result) {
+					/* First location where have and want
+					 * differ.
+					 */
+					result = 1;
+					*first_start = i;
+				}
+			} else {
+				if (result) {
+					/* First location where have and want
+					 * do not differ anymore.
+					 */
+					*first_len = i - *first_start;
+					break;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+		/* Did the loop terminate without setting first_len? */
+		if (result && ! *first_len)
+			*first_len = i - *first_start;
+		break;
+	case write_gran_256bytes:
+		for (j = 0; j < len / 256; j++) {
+			limit = min(256, len - j * 256);
+			/* Are 'have' and 'want' identical? */
+			if (memcmp(have + j * 256, want + j * 256, limit)) {
+				if (!result) {
+					/* First location where have and want
+					 * differ.
+					 */
+					result = 1;
+					*first_start = j * 256;
+				}
+			} else {
+				if (result) {
+					/* First location where have and want
+					 * do not differ anymore.
+					 */
+					*first_len = j * 256 - *first_start;
+					break;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+		/* Did the loop terminate without setting first_len? */
+		if (result && ! *first_len)
+			*first_len = min(j * 256 - *first_start, len);
+		break;
+	default:
+		msg_cerr("%s: Unsupported granularity! Please report a bug at "
+			 "flashrom at flashrom.org\n", __func__);
+	}
+	return result;
+}
+
 /* This function generates various test patterns useful for testing controller
  * and chip communication as well as chip behaviour.
  *
@@ -1203,7 +1298,8 @@
 	return ret;
 }
 
-/* This function shares a lot of its structure with erase_flash().
+/* This function shares a lot of its structure with erase_and_write_flash() and
+ * walk_eraseregions().
  * Even if an error is found, the function will keep going and check the rest.
  */
 static int selfcheck_eraseblocks(struct flashchip *flash)
@@ -1271,10 +1367,59 @@
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int erase_and_write_block_helper(struct flashchip *flash,
+					unsigned int start, unsigned int len,
+					uint8_t *oldcontents,
+					uint8_t *newcontents,
+					int (*erasefn) (struct flashchip *flash,
+							unsigned int addr,
+							unsigned int len))
+{
+	int starthere = 0;
+	int lenhere = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
+	enum write_granularity gran = write_gran_256bytes; /* FIXME */
+
+	/* oldcontents and newcontents are opaque to walk_eraseregions, and
+	 * need to be adjusted here to keep the impression of proper abstraction
+	 */
+	oldcontents += start;
+	newcontents += start;
+	/* FIXME: Assume 256 byte granularity for now to play it safe. */
+	if (need_erase(oldcontents, newcontents, len, gran)) {
+		msg_cdbg(" E");
+		ret = erasefn(flash, start, len);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		/* Erase was successful. Adjust oldcontents. */
+		memset(oldcontents + start, 0xff, len);
+	} else
+		msg_cdbg(" e");
+	while (get_next_write(oldcontents + starthere,
+			      newcontents + starthere,
+			      len - starthere, &starthere,
+			      &lenhere, gran)) {
+		msg_cdbg("W");
+		/* Needs the partial write function signature. */
+		ret = flash->write(flash, newcontents + starthere, start + starthere, lenhere);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+		starthere += lenhere;
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int walk_eraseregions(struct flashchip *flash, int erasefunction,
 			     int (*do_something) (struct flashchip *flash,
 						  unsigned int addr,
-						  unsigned int len))
+						  unsigned int len,
+						  uint8_t *param1,
+						  uint8_t *param2,
+						  int (*erasefn) (
+							struct flashchip *flash,
+							unsigned int addr,
+							unsigned int len)),
+			     void *param1, void *param2)
 {
 	int i, j;
 	unsigned int start = 0;
@@ -1286,21 +1431,22 @@
 		 */
 		len = eraser.eraseblocks[i].size;
 		for (j = 0; j < eraser.eraseblocks[i].count; j++) {
-			msg_cdbg("0x%06x-0x%06x, ", start,
+			msg_cdbg("0x%06x-0x%06x", start,
 				     start + len - 1);
-			if (do_something(flash, start, len))
+			if (do_something(flash, start, len, param1, param2, eraser.block_erase))
 				return 1;
+			msg_cdbg(", ");
 			start += len;
 		}
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int erase_flash(struct flashchip *flash)
+int erase_and_write_flash(struct flashchip *flash, uint8_t *oldcontents, uint8_t *newcontents)
 {
 	int k, ret = 0, found = 0;
 
-	msg_cinfo("Erasing flash chip... ");
+	msg_cinfo("Erasing and writing flash chip... ");
 	for (k = 0; k < NUM_ERASEFUNCTIONS; k++) {
 		struct block_eraser eraser = flash->block_erasers[k];
 
@@ -1324,7 +1470,7 @@
 		}
 		found = 1;
 		msg_cdbg("trying... ");
-		ret = walk_eraseregions(flash, k, eraser.block_erase);
+		ret = walk_eraseregions(flash, k, &erase_and_write_block_helper, oldcontents, newcontents);
 		msg_cdbg("\n");
 		/* If everything is OK, don't try another erase function. */
 		if (!ret)
@@ -1637,6 +1783,19 @@
 		programmer_shutdown();
 		return ret;
 	}
+
+	oldcontents = (uint8_t *) malloc(size);
+	/* Assume worst case: All bits are 0. */
+	memset(oldcontents, 0x00, size);
+	newcontents = (uint8_t *) malloc(size);
+	/* Assume best case: All bits should be 1. */
+	memset(newcontents, 0xff, size);
+	/* Side effect of the assumptions above: Default write action is erase
+	 * because newcontents looks like a completely erased chip, and
+	 * oldcontents being completely 0x00 means we have to erase everything
+	 * before we can write.
+	 */
+
 	if (erase_it) {
 		/* FIXME: Do we really want the scary warning if erase failed?
 		 * After all, after erase the chip is either blank or partially
@@ -1644,15 +1803,13 @@
 		 * so if the user wanted erase and reboots afterwards, the user
 		 * knows very well that booting won't work.
 		 */
-		if (erase_flash(flash)) {
+		if (erase_and_write_flash(flash, oldcontents, newcontents)) {
 			emergency_help_message();
 			programmer_shutdown();
 			return 1;
 		}
 	}
 
-	newcontents = (uint8_t *) calloc(size, sizeof(char));
-
 	if (write_it || verify_it) {
 		if (read_buf_from_file(newcontents, size, filename)) {
 			programmer_shutdown();
@@ -1665,8 +1822,6 @@
 #endif
 	}
 
-	oldcontents = (uint8_t *) calloc(size, sizeof(char));
-
 	/* Read the whole chip to be able to check whether regions need to be
 	 * erased and to give better diagnostics in case write fails.
 	 * The alternative would be to read only the regions which are to be
@@ -1686,9 +1841,9 @@
 	// ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
 	if (write_it) {
-		if (erase_flash(flash)) {
-			msg_cerr("Uh oh. Erase failed. Checking if anything "
-				 "changed.\n");
+		if (erase_and_write_flash(flash, oldcontents, newcontents)) {
+			msg_cerr("Uh oh. Erase/write failed. Checking if "
+				 "anything changed.\n");
 			if (!flash->read(flash, newcontents, 0, size)) {
 				if (!memcmp(oldcontents, newcontents, size)) {
 					msg_cinfo("Good. It seems nothing was "
@@ -1701,24 +1856,6 @@
 			emergency_help_message();
 			programmer_shutdown();
 			return 1;
-		}
-		msg_cinfo("Writing flash chip... ");
-		ret = flash->write(flash, newcontents, 0, size);
-		if (ret) {
-			msg_cerr("Uh oh. Write failed. Checking if anything "
-				 "changed.\n");
-			if (!flash->read(flash, newcontents, 0, size)) {
-				if (!memcmp(oldcontents, newcontents, size)) {
-					msg_cinfo("Good. It seems nothing was "
-						  "changed.\n");
-					nonfatal_help_message();
-					programmer_shutdown();
-					return 1;
-				}
-			}
-			emergency_help_message();
-			programmer_shutdown();
-			return 1;
 		} else {
 			msg_cinfo("COMPLETE.\n");
 		}


-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/





More information about the flashrom mailing list