[flashrom] [PATCH/RFC] finish jedec converstion

[Sean Nelson]

On 1/25/2010 10:46 AM, Sean Nelson wrote:
> On 1/25/2010 9:40 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>> Ummm... technically, the probe function changed (well, in practice the
>> command sequence should be identical). Do we want to keep TEST_OK_PR if
>> the probe function changed?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Carl-Daniel
>>
> On 1/24/2010 1:54 PM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
>>
>> I guess that was done wrong before, but all chips touched like that 
>> need to be changed back to untested unless you retested each of them. 
>> Otherwise the test flags become quite meaningless...
>>
>> Stefan
>
> I'm thinking that Stefan is right: we should change all the chips to 
> TEST_UNTESTED since the last few patches I've written have had radical 
> changes.
> This latest version of the patch reflects that.

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: feature_bits.diff
URL: <http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/attachments/20100125/09bf9b8c/attachment.ksh>