[flashrom] [PATCH/RFC] finish jedec converstion

Stefan Reinauer stefan.reinauer at coresystems.de
Sun Jan 24 22:54:46 CET 2010


I guess that was done wrong before, but all chips touched like that  
need to be changed back to untested unless you retested each of them.  
Otherwise the test flags become quite meaningless...

Stefan

On 23.01.2010, at 23:56, Sean Nelson <audiohacked at gmail.com> wrote:

> Complete the addition of Feature Bits for all Jedec based chips.
> Add Zero entries for FWH, SPI and "Odd Jedec" (FEATURE_ADDR_SHIFTED)  
> chips.
> Add FEATURE_SHORT_RESET
> fix feature_bits to 0 for SST49LF040B
>
> rewrite jedec functions to use getaddrmask
>
> convert write_49f002 to write_jedec_1
> convert write_w39v040c to write_jedec_1
> convert probe_w39v040c to probe_jedec
> convert write_49lf040 to write_jedec_1
> convert write_pm29f002 to write_jedec
> convert write_29f040b to write_jedec_1
> convert probe_29f040b to probe_jedec
> convert erase_chip_29f040b to erase_chip_block_jedec
> convert erase_sector_29f040b to erase_sector_jedec
> convert write_m29f002b to write_jedec
> convert write_m29f002t to write_jedec
> convert *_29f002 to *_jedec
>
> decouple unused files from Makefile:
> am29f040b.c
> en29f002a.c
> m29f002.c
> mx29f002.c
> pm29f002.c
> sst49lf040.c
> w39v040c.c
> w49f002u.c
>
> Updated patch with suggestions and fixes from carldani and uwe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Nelson <audiohacked at gmail.com>
>
> <feature_bits.diff>
> _______________________________________________
> flashrom mailing list
> flashrom at flashrom.org
> http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom




More information about the flashrom mailing list