[flashrom] [PATCH] Fix erase-blocks specification for the Atmel AT49F002(N)(T)

[Stefan Reinauer]

On 1/23/10 6:59 PM, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Oh, one question -- is the order of erase-blocks as specified in
> flashchips.c relevant? AT49F002(N) and AT49F002(N)T have different
> orders right now.
>   
The T variant is usually "top bootblock" while the other one has the
bootblock in the bottom.

This makes the T variants a good fit for x86 systems and the non-T
variants for everything else

Stefan

-- 
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
      Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: info at coresystems.de  • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866