[flashrom] [RFC] libflashrom design choices

[Stefan Reinauer]

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 16.09.2009 10:28, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
>   
>> Stefan Reinauer wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> since the request to turn flashrom into a library pops up from time to
>>>> time, we have to make sure the flashrom code doesn't have any nasty
>>>> surprises.
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> [..]
>>>  
>>> - possibly a libpci abstraction, or libpci emulation in libpayload
>>>     
>>>       
>
> Definitely. Some people have also suggested to use libpciaccess instead
> of libpci. Either way, we need to improve the abstraction.
>
>   
Doesn't look much easier to use than libpci... What's the benefit?