[flashrom] [PATCH] Add support for ASUS M2V-MX board

David Bartley dtbartle at csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Mon Nov 30 12:01:21 CET 2009


On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
<c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net> wrote:
> On 30.11.2009 10:19, David Bartley wrote:
>> The way I figured this out was by picking the chip closest to the BIOS
>> (the VT8237A southbridge) and inverting each of the GPIO lines one at
>> a time. The GPIO stuff was gleaned from the VT8237R datasheet since I
>> couldn't find the 'A one anywhere. All in all, a very fun and
>> educating experience; next step, coreboot!
>>
>
> Thanks for your patch. Overall, it looks fine. Someone with VIA
> datasheets may want to verify.
>
> Could you please add a Signed-off-by: statement to your patch? If you
> reply to your own mail with the Signed-off-by: on a separate line, that
> is sufficient. We need this to create an audit trail of who contributed
> which code. Details are available at
> http://www.coreboot.org/Development_Guidelines#Sign-off_Procedure
>

Done.

>
>> On a related note, reading the flash back seems slightly broken;
>> sometimes the read gets a few bytes wrong.
>>
>
> This is very interesting. If you read a few times (without
> writing/erasing in between), do the results change? If not, this points
> to an error during writing and we should make sure that this is fixed.
> An error during reading is much more difficult to diagnose. Please note
> that latest flashrom (0.9.1-r790) has some improved write checks and
> should detect write errors better. If you see a pattern in the broken
> addresses (e.g. always the same, wandering by x bytes, common prefix,
> common suffix), please tell us about it as well.

I noticed this before I had erase/write working and can reproduce this
if I reboot and try reading. I can no longer reproduce this after
flashing though.

-- David




More information about the flashrom mailing list