[coreboot] Who is still using a 1980's tty for coreboot development?
Sam Kuper
sam.kuper at uclmail.net
Fri May 25 11:56:00 CEST 2018
On 25/05/2018, Goetz Salzmann <ml-coreboot at blacknet.de> wrote:
> On Fri, May 25 '18 at 10:15, Patrick Georgi via coreboot wrote:
>> That is, who would unbearably suffer from 132 characters per line of
>> code?
>
> See https://mobile.twitter.com/changelog/status/999652792707858433
:D
Like quite a few people I've encountered, I set up my text editing
environment to make ≤80cpl convenient and ergonomic, because:
(a) it is such a prevalent convention; and
(b) ≤80cpl is very readable (at least, it is for me and quite a few
other people; and
(c) typically, when I encounter a codebase that doesn't follow ≤80cpl,
it doesn't follow *any* cpl convention and needs taking in hand.
Sticking to ≤80cpl should make it easier for anyone else, who also
does that, to work with the Coreboot codebase without having to modify
their text editing environment.
However...
> [On] the other hand I do so little
> coreboot development, that you should not base any decision on my humble
> opinion.
Ditto ;)
More information about the coreboot
mailing list