[coreboot] SPI TPM question

[Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo]

Hi Taiidan!


Thanks for the info!


I forgot to say that I'm working with an AMD demoboard yet supported, the Bettong one. But there are

a lot of features still missing but I can boot the board and I trying to test new thing with the board.


Thanks again

Jorge

________________________________
De: Taiidan at gmx.com <Taiidan at gmx.com>
Enviado: sábado, 19 de mayo de 2018 5:37:55
Para: Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo; coreboot at coreboot.org
Asunto: Re: [coreboot] SPI TPM question

On 05/15/2018 01:53 PM, Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo wrote:
> Hi all!
>
>
> This is my first message to the list.
Welcome sir! we are always pleased to see new users and companies using
coreboot - please feel free to ask any and all questions.

Coreboot will be a secure and affordable choice for what I presume is
your application.
if you wish to use coreboot in a production environment it might be a
good idea to inquire with your board vendor as to if you can save money
by purchasing "raw" boards without the usual AMI/Phoenix firmware/licenses.
> I would like to know if the TPM1.2 is supported through SPI?
>
> Enabling SPI_TPM and TPM in my board configuration throw an error. From src/drivers/spi/tpm/Kconfig
If your company permits I would suggest posting the board model, .config
file, etc whenever you have an issue as the wiki advises - remember sure
to remove identifiers such as MAC address and serials.
> Any options to get TPM1.2 SPI support?
I would suggest emailing the people behind the HEADS project such as
Trammel Hudson - AFAIK they are the only ones currently doing major
coreboot related TPM work and would probably be willing to provide some
assistance...

https://trmm.net/About
and
https://github.com/osresearch/heads
https://github.com/osresearch/heads/issues/287 - interesting thread
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20180521/210018aa/attachment.html>