[coreboot] Why do we have FSP-S

[Ivan Ivanov]

I think, by "The Right Direction" he meant having the open source code
instead of FSP-S blobs.
'Why do we have FSP-S' - I have the same question. Why this code must
be kept closed, Intel?
Open source is always better than closed, and your major competitor -
AMD - would not be able
to use your source code - not just because of the licenses, but
because your CPUs are so different

2018-05-02 10:45 GMT+03:00 Duncan <dguthrie at posteo.net>:
> Hello Zoran,
>
> Zoran Stojsavljevic:
>>> Our recommendation for some time has been a mix -- arm64 client devices
>>> (laptops, tablets, etc.) and ppc64el servers.  With those two, you can
>>> replace x86 entirely if you don't have proprietary software in your
>>> environment.
>>
>> With all due respect, this is the discussion about Coreboot going into
>> The Right Direction! This is what I actually aimed for. :-)
>>
>
> Please clarify what "The Right Direction" is. You have confused me, as I
> thought the thread was about 'Why do we have FSP-S'.
>
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot