[coreboot] Why do we have FSP-S

Timothy Pearson tpearson at raptorengineering.com
Tue May 1 22:01:25 CEST 2018


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/01/2018 02:46 PM, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote:
>> Our recommendation for some time has been a mix -- arm64 client devices
>> (laptops, tablets, etc.) and ppc64el servers.  With those two, you can
>> replace x86 entirely if you don't have proprietary software in your
>> environment.
> 
> With all due respect, this is the discussion about Coreboot going into
> The Right Direction! This is what I actually aimed for. :-)
> 

Well, to bring this even further back on topic, it's an open secret that
the POWER8/POWER9 IPL process is rather bloated.  It's all open, but
bloated.

I'd love to see a coreboot port done in earnest to POWER9.  We have all
the information we need to do it, just need buy-in from serious
developers.  Might even be some free hardware in it for interested
people....

- -- 
Timothy Pearson
Raptor Engineering
+1 (415) 727-8645 (direct line)
+1 (512) 690-0200 (switchboard)
https://www.raptorengineering.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJa6MeSAAoJEK+E3vEXDOFblSQIAJ9rnmQaNttblYXGPbKyDXp1
gjBSTRrWk93ZI/bn69nZSS+YS4tp3r/6GGkH9WGGX6/R+5/bk0Dd3gOILBt+MODv
n+jlOccEbQn6Gnq/LkjzaYXVu5OI6kUmASJxSdylCu9qsqrbvDOUAkbCIuqWue81
Vp6UeOY0OSn0+fRtbYrfdUTJa+diHXC7YmfLliIk/8eTETU0TaQiZTmHtbiHPUWd
qP6IV6MTuOFc30WU0qoKDPzX4PiKCUN8WSNs800Pb9eawtK6yo/5Jmb2aQG25jyD
/T8EfLHUVvfyvMy9JP9gi1v2tq4DDacnUZwdFll+toNUjjkpVLk5QjP7mMjRIQA=
=r15a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the coreboot mailing list