[coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?
piotr.krol at 3mdeb.com
Mon Oct 2 01:03:42 CEST 2017
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 09/21/2017 04:52 PM, Kyösti Mälkki wrote:
> I can help you to get these to EARLY_CBMEM_INIT. That's the first
> obstacle with Geode. It's recommended that coreboot would store
> the timebase / TSC information so that cpufreq support is not
> needed in kernel. I have some on-going work on AMD timestamps
Please let me know what I can do to help you implement that. We have
all hardware at hand and would be glad to fix that till ECC2017 if
I also would like to work on upstreaming other alix and apu platform,
but first want to clean things with cbmem.
BTW will you attend ? It would be great to meet you.
> Do you mean supported boards table, and the 3rd column from left
> for ALIX 2C or ALIX 6 has invalid links? That would not be your
> fault. When alix.2d was pushed to board_status, it also refreshes
> .2c and .6 entries even when they don't exist as individual updates
> on the wiki.
Yes, this is what I meant. We get access to wiki and fixed that issue.
Now correct logs were uploaded to supported boards site.
Embedded Systems Consultant
https://3mdeb.com | @3mdeb_com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the coreboot