[coreboot] new problem with KGPE-d16

Timothy Pearson tpearson at raptorengineering.com
Tue Jan 10 00:13:38 CET 2017


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/09/2017 05:12 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:00 PM Timothy Pearson
> <tpearson at raptorengineering.com <mailto:tpearson at raptorengineering.com>>
> wrote:
> 
>     -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>     Hash: SHA1
> 
>     On 01/09/2017 04:55 PM, ron minnich wrote:
>     > yes I do. I'm working from ToT. Bisecting now
> 
>     This brings up an interesting question.  How should we be testing for
>     payload-dependent failures on systems like the REACTS?  The possibility
>     of the payload causing breakage within coreboot itself was not even
>     considered before now.
> 
> 
> I think what we need is a good regression test payload kernel. This is
> what I"ve done on ports to powerpc and riscv. You have a simple
> priveleged mode bundle of code that exercises known failure cases. 
> 
> I've found plan 9  (now harvey) to be an easy code base for this, but a
> smaller, lighter kernel would probably be even better. 

Agreed.  I'll add this to our master list of desired features in REACTS.

- -- 
Timothy Pearson
Raptor Engineering
+1 (415) 727-8645 (direct line)
+1 (512) 690-0200 (switchboard)
https://www.raptorengineering.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYdBkiAAoJEK+E3vEXDOFbtYYH/RXbDOTf5Z8QG+QM/hvuInXt
dgoQ766jXr12b7qbNb/Do+oj6NHKxjiDfAWMbrPUKYTNCaxP22JDF3qhohQQGs8c
3YCJ8rYGM9G0JGPPoY8mgIfY5UjnEDC5sQdJewLD9nw1VsxPAC+IVVY62wPSacKV
zdoDxF3lKLjqbQAqDmJEpAJSTmULZqhRsWKNvffiITQvcD2hIwuWNpGW5oibCHtD
27kFvy6vn32hQRBa0b97daq2VN3Kguwk+fNiGo+rVQd/jPveljq6PA0GWA9IlU5R
5s/6vVapgglwhycQZS/GcYrluPKA8lA9FIJjX5GkXQwKHRLpeu3N9jnjxfg6+4M=
=zHWt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the coreboot mailing list