[coreboot] [VERY IMPORTANT] Announcement regarding Apollo Lake Coreboot building

Aaron Durbin adurbin at google.com
Wed Feb 22 16:59:22 CET 2017


On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Nico Huber <nico.huber at secunet.com> wrote:
> On 22.02.2017 08:12, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote:
>> Hello to community,
>>
>> I finally, after 3 days of additional very hard struggle, found out why I
>> have (while I am in the last stage of building CBFS) nonsense while
>> building APL-I Coreboot coreboot.rom?!
>>
>> Please, read carefully this announcement.
>>
>> For last three days I came to hard stop because of this failure:
>>
>> Just quick look into the final failure (all passed, but last stage - IFD
>> failed):
>>
>>     Compile IFDTOOL
>>     HOSTCC     util/ifdfake/ifdfake
>>     DD         Adding Intel Firmware Descriptor
>>     IFDTOOL    Unlocking Management Engine
>> File build/coreboot.pre is 8388608 bytes
>> No Flash Descriptor found in this image
>> *src/southbridge/intel/common/firmware/Makefile.inc:50: recipe for target
>> 'add_intel_firmware' failed*
>> *make: *** [add_intel_firmware] Error 1*
>> [user at localhost coreboot]$
>>
>> At first, I suspect that culprit my .config file, but I have checked it
>> several times (maybe > dozen), and I could NOT find any problem with it
>> (except minor doubts).
>>
>> Then I switched to inspect -southbridge- setup, but these is none, since
>> (simplified explanation/view) APL-I is SoC.
>>
>> The next phase was to inspect
>> *src/southbridge/intel/common/firmware/Makefile.inc* , but there (although
>> my make scripting is rusty) I could NOT find any problem...
>>
>> Finally, somewhere around 2:00 AM I noticed/determined the root cause of
>> the problem: the util/ifdtool/ifdtool.c, line:
>>           if (*(uint32_t *) (image + i) == *0x0FF0A55A*) {
>>
>> YET another INTEL IOTG PED hidden road bomb: the latest APL-I FSP: APL-I_
>> FSP/ApolloLakeFspBinPkg/FspBin/ApolloLakeFsp.fd does NOT have pattern
>> *0x0FF0A55A* embedded in it (I have checked with HxD WIN tool).
>
> Looks like this [VERY IMPORTANT] Announcement is about you, confusing
> two very different concepts. FSP is a binary program run by coreboot
> and has nothing in common with the Intel Firmware Descriptor. It's
> called *.fd for some reason I don't know, but I'm pretty sure it's
> another binary. The Firmware Descriptor describes some flash parameters
> and soft straps. It's just data, no program. You only need it as an OEM
> to build a full ROM image for a new system. If you have a system that
> already runs another firmware, you can just keep the existing descriptor
> in place.

I missed that bit. Yes, the .fd is just the extension FSP decided to
use for their blob.

>
> Nico
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot



More information about the coreboot mailing list