[coreboot] Add coreboot storage driver

[Julius Werner]

+1 for preferring a single-core concurrency model. This would be much more
likely to be reusable for other platforms, and much simpler to maintain in
the long run (way less platform-specific details to keep track of and
figure out again and again for every new chipset). You CAR problems would
become much more simple... just make sure the scheduler structures get
migrated together with the rest of the globals and it should work fine out
of the box.

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:31 PM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM Nico Huber <nico.h at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Another idea just popped up: Performing "background" tasks in udelay()
>> / mdelay() implementations ;)
>>
>
> that is adurbin's threading model. I really like it.
>
> A lot of times, concurrency will get you just as far as ||ism without the
> nastiness.
>
> But if we're going to make a full up kernel for rom, my suggestion is we
> could start with a real kernel, perhaps linux. We could then rename
> coreboot to, say, LinuxBIOS.
>
> ron
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> https://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20170213/db088034/attachment.html>