[coreboot] Depthcharge License

[Ivan Ivanov]

This commit got merged and the Depthcharge now should have the
requested license files
at its root directory. Dear friend, please let us learn about your
device once it is released,
maybe some of the coreboot developers would want to get your device -
to use, and possibly help

Best regards,
Ivan Ivanov

2017-12-21 21:34 GMT+03:00 Aaron Durbin via coreboot <coreboot at coreboot.org>:
> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/platform/depthcharge/+/837589
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:14 AM, <tturne at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-12-19 09:53, David Hendricks wrote:
>>>
>>> To be fair, it appears that many source files refer to a non-existent
>>> LICENSE file. Someone on the CrOS team should probably just add the
>>> LICENSE file for depthcharge and/or contact mal@ to see how the
>>> license info is being collected these days (e.g. for
>>> chrome://os-credits [3]).
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the input on the DC licensing, and because lawyers are involved
>> I need to ask a direct question.
>> Can a Depthcharge maintainer (anybody who has +2 gerrit authority would
>> suffice) state on this thread
>> that the Depthcharge project license is GPLv2 (or later)?
>>
>> I know this feels redundant and that the question has been asked and
>> answered, I'm just trying
>> to satisfy our internal legal group.
>>
>> Per David's point above, this direct question would not be required to
>> satisfy the lawyers
>> if a top-level COPYING or LICENSE file is added to Depthcharge.  Which I
>> will be happy to
>> add once I'm able to start contributing to the project.
>> Cheers,
>> T.mike
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the
>>>> original question, which boils down to Read The Source?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot
>>>> <coreboot at coreboot.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM, <tturne at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> On 2017-12-15 13:39, tturne at codeaurora.org wrote:
>>>> Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org [1] requires us to vet the
>>>> various
>>>> licenses, etc.
>>>>
>>>> There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the
>>>> Depthcharge tree.
>>>>
>>>> My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).
>>>>
>>>> How would I confirm this with an online source?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> T.mike
>>>>
>>>> Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot
>>>> list?
>>>
>>>
>>> Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository  have licenses at
>>> the top of each file. They are GPLv2.
>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> T.mike
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
>>>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
>>>
>>>  --
>>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
>>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
>>> --
>>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
>>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot [2]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1] http://coreboot.org
>>> [2] https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>>> [3] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/licenses
>
>
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot