[coreboot] Depthcharge License

[David Hendricks]

To be fair, it appears that many source files refer to a non-existent
LICENSE file. Someone on the CrOS team should probably just add the LICENSE
file for depthcharge and/or contact mal@ to see how the license info is
being collected these days (e.g. for chrome://os-credits
<https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/licenses>).

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:19 AM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there even a question? Looks like aaron just answered the original
> question, which boils down to Read The Source?
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM Aaron Durbin via coreboot <
> coreboot at coreboot.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:03 AM, <tturne at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-12-15 13:39, tturne at codeaurora.org wrote:
>>>
>>>> Preparing to mirror the coreboot.org requires us to vet the various
>>>> licenses, etc.
>>>>
>>>> There doesn't appear to be a LICENSE or COPYING file in the Depthcharge
>>>> tree.
>>>>
>>>> My understanding is that Depthcharge is licensed GPLv2 (or later).
>>>>
>>>> How would I confirm this with an online source?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> T.mike
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should this query be posted on Chromium list rather than Coreboot list?
>>>
>>>
>> Probably. The files in the depthcharge repository  have licenses at the
>> top of each file. They are GPLv2.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>> T.mike
>>>
>>> --
>>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
>>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>>>
>> --
>> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
>> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20171219/984c5421/attachment.html>