[coreboot] RFC: coding style: "standard" defines

Patrick Georgi pgeorgi at google.com
Mon Feb 8 12:10:00 CET 2016

2016-02-04 10:35 GMT+01:00 Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi at google.com>:
> during the review of some commits that are in the process of being
> upstreamed from Chrome OS, people noticed that chipset drivers like to
> define their own TRUE/FALSE defines (sometimes prefixed to), and I
> have seen a bunch of #define BIT{0-31} ..., too, because that seems to
> be the house rules in some firmware communities.
Seems like for the BIT defines, all variants are popular. Any
objection with moving them to src/include instead of having various
copies across the tree?

Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman, Paul Terence Manicle

More information about the coreboot mailing list