[coreboot] A case for branching AGESA
gaumless at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 00:04:03 CET 2015
Sorry, I should have said 'removal from the coreboot master branch'.
That's what we're discussing in both contexts. All 'removed' chips
and platforms will still be accessible in one of the version branches
if desired. Nico demonstrated this today by cherry-picking patches
over to the 4.2 branch.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Alex Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Martin Roth <gaumless at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Let's table the discussion of agesa (and other) platform removal for
> I didn't talk about removal. I don't understand why people think
> "removal" in the context of the discussion I _attempted_ to start.
> Let's also table the discussion about agesa (and other) platform
> I'm looking forward to seeing the draft of the removal plans. Maybe
> removal is even better than branching.
More information about the coreboot