[coreboot] [poll] device_t

[Patrick Georgi]

2015-05-07 22:00 GMT+02:00 Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer at coreboot.org>:
> With our current bootblock concept, it is never going away on x86 (for
> bootblock usage)
Which isn't that much of a problem once we provide separate headers
for x86 bootblock code. There's really very tiny overlap.
That could then be reused to deal with raminit on romcc-boards, too:
from coreboot's point of view, raminit is just an overly large
piece of cache-as-ram code, followed by a raminit noop.
This is simplified by the lack of the need for development tools (eg
printk) to develop new non-car x86 raminits.


One of these days...
Patrick
-- 
Google Germany GmbH, ABC-Str. 19, 20354 Hamburg
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores