[coreboot] board-status "binary"

John Lewis jlewis at johnlewis.ie
Sat Nov 22 12:22:05 CET 2014



On 21/11/14 21:58, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> On 14.11.2014 12:44, John Lewis wrote:
>> Hey y'all,
>>
>> I've modified the board-status script to have as few external
>> dependencies as possible, be a self-extracting, self-running "binary".
>> and removed the time-stamp to keep the number initial commits down. Feel
>> free to tell me how bad it is and how it murdered your children. :P
>>
> Never send binaries to the list.

A link could be just as malicious. What way should I do it?

> And about the idea: current code needs git tree. I tried to make changes
> to make it possible to have board-status without git tree.
>
> Result: those change were ignored, bikeshed or vetoed.
>
> Long story short: nobody cares.

At some point Ron did care, otherwise we wouldn't have been talking 
about it, and I certainly do. I can tell you anecdotally which 
Chromebooks are being used and should remain live in the code-base 
(hint: all of them) but I thought we were trying to be more scientific 
about it than that.

>> John.
>>
>>
>
>



More information about the coreboot mailing list