[coreboot] AMD's binary-only AGESA libraries

[Kyösti Mälkki]

On 11/06/2014 01:25 AM, ron minnich wrote:
> This discussion has gone way off base, as such discussions can do when
> licensing comes into the picture.
>
> Bruce asked a simple question: can we rename some directories/move
> some code around in response to a change in how a vendor is delivering
> their chipset support?
>

Ron, to clarify, Bruce did not originally pop this question.

See http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/7149/

> That's a pretty simple question.
>
> All of a sudden we're talking about what AMD should have done, should
> do now, or will do. That's not the question.
>
> Bruce, is it possible to rephrase your question in simple terms, one
> paragraph, and not bring in what 3rd parties such as Sage and AMD
> might do, and just pose the question absent any thought to what might
> happen at some future time?
>

Ron, see Marc's blocking review on patchset 2. That one brought the 
speculations of what future might bring into this discussion.

> thanks
>
> ron
>


Kyösti