[coreboot] New addendums to INTEL FSP family
mr.nuke.me at gmail.com
Wed Apr 2 19:36:27 CEST 2014
On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 10:25:39 AM ron minnich wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:17 AM, David Hubbard
> <david.c.hubbard+coreboot at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Could the two interested parties negotiate a compromise? In my mind that's
> > Google calling Intel, and they talk it over. That probably just
> > demonstrates how little I understand about who and what is involved.
> Goodness, you think that has not happened, frequently, not just with
> Google but with many parties over the last 15 years? I'm afraid it
> demonstrates what you said :-(
Going back to the original FSP issue here. What does it take to get Intel to
consider putting FSP in a reasonably upstreamable state?
More information about the coreboot