Sun Dec 9 17:34:17 CET 2012
00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
(prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. Unknown device 6010
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Region 4: I/O ports at d000 [size=16]
Capabilities: [c0] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
00: 06 11 71 05 07 00 90 02 06 8a 01 01 00 20 00 00
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 01 d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 11 10 60
10h - 1Ch above are all 0, so I assume that there are no BASE ADDRESS
registers allocated here. One thing I am curious about is that according
to the PCI spec (I only have version 2.1) the base address registers
start at 10h, so why, in the above , does the IDE controller, and in
fact most of the devices on the board use the higher base address
Another question I have is the fact that 20h contians d001h. The PCI
spec does mention that a device may have don't care bits in the base
address. So can I assume that, that is the case here ?
Or is there some strange bit shifting going on ?
What confuses me is that on an earlier version (head version 2401) this
worked. Comparing the two versions I can see there have been changes to
the PCI parts of the code, but nothing to dramatic, and as I have said
no one else seems to be having problems.
The EPIA code is more or less the same, just a few text changes in the
debug so was it just working by luck before ?
Does anyone have any thoughts on why the enumeration is wrong ?
I guess I am looking at a wrongly configured southbridge chip or
More information about the coreboot