[coreboot] E350M1 does not POST

She, Kerry Kerry.She at amd.com
Wed Sep 7 11:51:11 CEST 2011


 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org [mailto:coreboot- 

> bounces at coreboot.org] On Behalf Of perh52 at runbox.com

> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 12:37 AM

> To: coreboot

> Subject: [coreboot] E350M1 does not POST

> 

> >>> Hi,

> >>>

> >>>> Upon booting, I get this:

> >>>

> >>> [...]

> >>>

> >>> you could try commit 0df0e14fb, that may or may not work, the 

> >>> commit

> after

> >>> that broke fusion boards completely, apparently.

> >>>

> >>> Florian

> >>>

> >> Thank you! I can confirm that 0df0e14fb works properly.

> >> -Marshall

> >

> >Frank,

> >

> >It looks like we have a regression. Is there some dependency on the 

> >other patches that have not yet been committed?

> >

> >Marc

> 

> Unfortunately git bisect is no help here because the commit which 

> caused the regression was a huge one.

> 

> It's important that large patches are broken down into a set of small 

> comprehensible patches, each with an explanatory commit message.

> 

> <<quote from git-bisect-lk2009.html documentation>> ...

> sometimes "interesting" changes of behavior in the software are 

> introduced in some commits.

> 

> In fact people are specially interested in commits that introduce a 

> "bad" behavior, called a bug or a regression. They are interested in 

> these commits because a commit (hopefully) contains a very small set 

> of source code changes. And it's much easier to understand and 

> properly fix a problem when you only need to check a very small set of


> changes, than when you don't know where look in the first place.

> 

> So to help people find commits that introduce a "bad" behavior, the 

> "git bisect" set of commands was invented.

 

Hello, All

 

Since commit 84cbce2 cause E350M1 not POST, Following patches should
resolve this regression problem, please see the attachment in detail.

I have test it on a Persimmon mainboard, anybody can have a test on
E350M1?

Thanks

--

Kerry sheh

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20110907/cb70db3b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1_gnbpcie_macro.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 970 bytes
Desc: 1_gnbpcie_macro.patch
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20110907/cb70db3b/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2_buffer_addr.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1079 bytes
Desc: 2_buffer_addr.patch
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20110907/cb70db3b/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 3_ht_mailbox.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2789 bytes
Desc: 3_ht_mailbox.patch
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20110907/cb70db3b/attachment-0002.obj>


More information about the coreboot mailing list