[coreboot] Kconfig vs. devicetree vs. CMOS policy for options?

Andrew nitr0 at seti.kr.ua
Mon May 16 19:02:03 CEST 2011

16.05.2011 19:31, Marc Jones пишет:
> 2. CMOS is not a good place for platform options either. It is good
> for runtime options, but I don't think that there are many options for
> users to change. What options users would change and how will they
> change them? CMOS options could even go into the device tree.
IMHO device operation modes (for ex., AHCI/legacy IDE for SATA, LPT port 
modes, etc) should be in CMOS. Also switches for enabling/disabling 
devices (LPT, FDD, IDE/SATA, etc) should be in CMOS.

More information about the coreboot mailing list