[coreboot] sb800 code derived from sb700 implementation
stepan at coreboot.org
Wed Jan 5 01:11:23 CET 2011
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net> [110105 00:05]:
> Still, having the code checked in is IMHO better than having it on the
> list. If there are any CIMx integration issues later, we still have the
> alternative code (and as a nice benefit, we can actually touch that code
> whereas CIMx should be kept unchanged to allow easier updates).
I would prefer to see CIMx integration issues fixed rather than worked
around with an in-tree fork for a non-existant user base that might
experience problems in the unforseeable future.
There is nothing that prevents us from reporting issues with the CIMx
code back to AMD to have it fixed.
More information about the coreboot