[coreboot] [PATCH] Fam10 FIDVID in SVI 01/25

Marc Jones marcj303 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 28 00:43:30 CET 2011


On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:27 PM, xdrudis <xdrudis at tinet.cat> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:31:29PM +0100, Georgi, Patrick wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 07:35 +0100 schrieb xdrudis:
>> > see patch
>> Any opinion on these patches? Patch 1-8 seem to be refactorings only,
>> and splitting functions into smaller logical units looks good to me, but
>> I'd like to hear from someone deeper in the AMD code.
>>
>
> Yes, if these 8 are not refactorings, then it's a bug.
>
> I know it's a little work to review it all, but it does not have
> to be one person. You can review just one patch, maybe.
>
> Testing is maybe better to do with all of them, or all without
> negative reviews, or something. I've tested them one by one
> and it is a little a waste of time. And I haven't found a single
> one that fixes it for me. Must be a combination, possibly not
> all but not sure which ones. They're secuential although not
> each and every one needs all previous ones.
>
> By the way testing for both SVI and PVI is welcome (for AMD FAM 10).
> I don't intend to break PVI, but I can't test it.
>
> Some of the later ones may be a little paranoid or a matter of taste
> but I tried to split them in small pieces so they can be rejected
> or modified.

Acked-by: Marc Jones <marcj303 at gmail.com>

r6387


-- 
http://se-eng.com




More information about the coreboot mailing list