[coreboot] [PATCH] outb(* 0x80) to post_code()

Keith Hui buurin at gmail.com
Sat Feb 26 01:16:38 CET 2011


> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:48:24 +0200
> From: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me at gmail.com>
> To: "coreboot at coreboot.org" <coreboot at coreboot.org>
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] [PATCH] outb(* 0x80) to post_code()
> Message-ID: <4D67EB68.2090609 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Find attached the version with the colloquial verbiage abridged.
>
> Alex

IMO POST_DIE should not be 0xff to reduce confusion. That code, in
most other BIOS vendors, is emitted when all is well and OS has begun
booting. I am proposing reserving the range 0xE0-0xEF for
unrecoverable errors. We already have POST_DEAD_CODE being 0xEE. Going
along this line we should make POST_DIE 0xEF, possibly alternating
with another code if more detail is to be provided.

What do you think?




More information about the coreboot mailing list