[coreboot] [PATCH] disabling microcode update

Alex G. mr.nuke.me at gmail.com
Tue Feb 22 23:58:59 CET 2011


On 02/22/2011 02:47 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote:
>> Does everyone prefer to have it not include update_microcode.c and
>> change romstage.c in those boards that call update_microcode(...) ?
> 
> At least I like this better. It makes it clear what effect this
> option has for mainboard code.
> 
If this option ever existed, I want it to stay out of my way entirely. I
don't even want to know it exists without explicitly searching for it. I
don't want to ever be in the situation where I find out that my board
froze because the microcode update was disabled, and I don't want
newcomers to waste their time asking about that pompous sounding
"Disable Microcode update" option in menuconfig.

If I _really_ wanted to disable microcode updates, I would simply
comment out a line of code.

As far as the licensing discusion gooes, I have thought of this
intensely. I don't see microcode as violating my freedom. It is
hardware. modifying microcode modifies the hardware. This is something
that software cannot do.

+ We are firmware developers, not hardware engineers.

I'm not voting no on this, just so as long as it is completely invisible
to me.

Alex




More information about the coreboot mailing list