[coreboot] [PATCH try 2] Reduce duplicate definition in CAR code.

[Warren Turkal]

I have run "util/abuild/abuild -a -c 8", and nothing showed up except
some lib/gcc.c stuff that I have no idea how to fix.

I put the _ASM on to note that it's adding asm code. I figured that'd
make it more obvious. Is it obvious enough without the _ASM?

wt

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:46 PM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Warren Turkal <wt at penguintechs.org> wrote:
>> The common mtrr registers are separated into their own macros. For
>> instance, check out the AMD car code. AMD has additional mtrr
>> registers that are used. There is an AMD_MTRR_MSRS_TABLE_ENTRIES_ASM
>> as a result. Is this not enough to separate the vendors?
>>
>> Or is your assertion that the values in
>> X86_MTRR_MSRS_TABLE_ENTRIES_ASM can vary?
>
>
> oops, I misread it. OK, got it, makes sense.
>
> I think you can leave the _ASM off since you are using as .macro
> anyway -- you can't use it anywhere but assembly. If we're all certain
> that those registers are all safely common across all systems, I guess
> it works for me.
>
> Possibly we should get some testing to make sure it's good.
>
> ron
>