[coreboot] [PATCH] Factor out common CAR asm snippets

[Warren Turkal]

For line 31 and 37 of src/include/x86/car.h, does cache mean L1 cache?
If so, it might be nice to make the macros say l1 explicitly. Also, I
agree with Myles on not having redundant comments.

It might also be nice for the comments before each macro to indicate
which registers get trashed within the macro. Maybe even make the
register name a parameter of the macro, though I'm not sure if that
would make sense.

Also, {en,dis}able mtrr should document which mtrr is getting
{en,dis}abled as it looks like a specific one and not all of them. The
name of those macros should probably reflect which mtrr as well.

Thanks,
wt

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Uwe Hermann <uwe at hermann-uwe.de> wrote:
> See patch.
>
> abuilt-tested.
>
>
> Uwe.
> --
> http://hermann-uwe.de     | http://sigrok.org
> http://randomprojects.org | http://unmaintained-free-software.org
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
> http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>