[coreboot] [Patch] SSE & SSE2
mylesgw at gmail.com
Wed Mar 17 03:15:37 CET 2010
> > I understood that, but I guess I was looking in the wrong places.
> > I still think we should source all of the models for the intel CPUs.
> Hah, sorry I forgot about that hunk.... 5231
> >>> Well then we are going to need a different solution......
> >> I think the code as it is works just fine. Ok, the warnings should be
> >> silenced, but that's about it.
> > The easiest way is to have SSE and SSE2 default to n. Then there will
> be no
> > warnings, and people can enable them when they need them.
> I think you mentioned that a warning is generally good if people don't
> set this explicitly...
> So maybe we should just fix what we know for sure
> (most likely those with no SSE and SSE2) and wait for people to fix this
> while they come along these CPUs/sockets... If nobody does, the warning
> is maybe not critical for them ;)
Sure. That does seem like the best way.
> > It's confusing to have SSE and SSE2 settings in some of the models, but
> > others.
> Yes. Since one socket can choose multiple cpus, it must go in the socket
> to be safe (otherwise a SSE enabled CPU might break a socket with a
> non-SSE enabled CPU), but there are also CPU models that don't come in
> sockets... "Fake" sockets?
> Better solution? Set it in the CPU for those,
> with a comment?
That's my vote.
More information about the coreboot