[coreboot] [patch] RE: Fam10 breakage

[Patrick Georgi]

Am 01.03.2010 17:54, schrieb Myles Watson:
>>> that checks for RAMBASE < 0xa0000 and eheap > 0xa0000?  One large stack
>>> could just as easily break this.
>> True. Attached patch might do this (only moderately tested)
> Acked-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com>
Thanks, r5181

>> With those two gone, we could hide RAMBASE somewhere in Kconfig or
>> eliminate it completely.
> Wasn't there a board with RAMBASE at 32 M too?
Might be Rudolf's, to help with suspend/resume.


Patrick