[coreboot] [PATCH] fix normal vs. fallback

Peter Stuge peter at stuge.se
Fri Jul 9 15:10:14 CEST 2010

Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Even though the normal/fallback mechanism uses CMOS, it does not
> require an option table.
> Are there advantages in changing this?

One advantage would be that any use of NVRAM always implies having an
option table, which I think makes sense. Somewhere it needs to be
specified what bit(s) the mechanism uses, better in an option table
than hardcoded IMO.


More information about the coreboot mailing list