[coreboot] [PATCH] fix normal vs. fallback

[Myles Watson]

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Patrick Georgi <patrick at georgi-clan.de> wrote:
> Am 08.07.2010 19:50, schrieb Myles Watson:
>> BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL allows the user to use CMOS values to select which
>> image to boot.  This patch:
>>
>> - makes BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL depend on USE_OPTION_TABLE
> This would prevent the "old" scheme of building a fallback image (which
> is built first) with BOOTBLOCK_NORMAL and _no_ USE_OPTION_TABLE (so it
> uses the hardcoded defaults) and a normal image with USE_OPTION_TABLE.
So I probably went too far.  I should have made it depend on HAVE_OPTION_TABLE.

>> - makes compilation of bootblock.inc depend on OPTION_TABLE_H
> How does this interact with BOOTBLOCK_SIMPLE builds without
> USE_OPTION_TABLE?
It shouldn't make a difference.  OPTION_TABLE_H is empty if there isn't one.

Thanks,
Myles