[coreboot] Relocable payloads
stepan at coresystems.de
Fri Feb 26 02:26:03 CET 2010
On 2/26/10 2:23 AM, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> On 2/25/10 11:44 PM, Myles Watson wrote:
>> In case someone wants to look into this. The attached patch tries
>> to do
>> relocable coreboot_ram. It does not work. It looks like dynamic
>> linker does not
>> fix call to hardware main in the c_start.o - reason is unknown.
>> Relocating coreboot_ram seems like a great idea. It seems like there
>> was a lot of discussion on the mailing list with v3 about PIC and why
>> it couldn't work for us. My memory about it is fuzzy now, but a
>> little searching might turn something up.
> The idea sounds incredibly sweet.
> But lets make sure we gain from it in the end...
> Relocating coreboot_ram would safe us two 1MB sized memcpy on the
> resume path, so we would safe at least 200 microseconds of boot time
> in the case we're resuming. (assuming memory is 6.4G/s, DDR2-800 aka
> PC2-6400) .... 0.2milliseconds of 400+... worth the complexity?
minus the time added needed by the linker for the linking..
How does linking go with lzma?
- do the relocations require more RAM? How much?
- can the sections and relocations be lzma'ed together? or are they
separate files in CBFS?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the coreboot