[coreboot] [PATCH] libgcc regparm workaround

[Segher Boessenkool]

>> You don't need the -( -) here, FWIW.  libgcc does not require symbols
>> from
>> coreboot.a ;-)
> Yes, actually it does. On powerpc libgcc uses external symbols that it
> does not provide.

Do you mean abort()?  Yeah, you need to provide that yourself, on all  
targets
(nothing special about PowerPC); the same is true for memcpy(), memset 
(),
memmove(), memcmp().  FWIW, any GCC-compiled code can require those, not
only code in libgcc.


Segher