[coreboot] [PATCH] libgcc regparm workaround

Stefan Reinauer stepan at coresystems.de
Sat Sep 26 17:54:15 CEST 2009

Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> I'm worried about any libgcc compiled with regparm!=0, but for now this
>> patch improves the situation.
> libgcc uses the default calling convention. 
Is there an attribute to say "this function uses the default calling
convention no matter what CFLAGS we have right now"?

More information about the coreboot mailing list