[coreboot] [PATCH] resource allocator hole handling (simple and old)
Myles Watson
mylesgw at gmail.com
Wed Oct 28 15:51:46 CET 2009
> I checked the code and size 0 resources are skipped already..
Yes, I should have remembered that.
> so generally that check for res->size could be dropped completely in
> above construct, making it
>
> /* Is it already outside the limits? */
> - if (res->size && (((res->base + res->size -1) < lim->base) ||
> - (res->base > lim->limit)))
> + if (((res->base + res->size -1) < lim->base) || (res->base >
> lim->limit))
> continue;
That could be done. There's no functional difference as long as the check
for size 0 resources stays.
Thanks,
Myles
More information about the coreboot
mailing list