[coreboot] small patch for prototypes and unused variables

ron minnich rminnich at gmail.com
Tue Oct 27 17:10:24 CET 2009

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com> wrote:

> Something like that would be fine with me, but since we'd do it just to do
> it, not to make the code cleaner, maybe it's just as good to put the
> prototypes by the functions.

In the case of that function you need a proto outside the file anyway.

Having to put a proto next to a function makes the whole thing seem
kind of pointless :-)


More information about the coreboot mailing list