[coreboot] build service results for r4795

[Stefan Reinauer]

Myles Watson wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, coreboot information
> <info at coresystems.de <mailto:info at coresystems.de>> wrote:
>
>     Dear coreboot readers!
>
>     This is the automatic build system of coreboot.
>
>     The developer "myles" checked in revision 4795 to
>     the coreboot repository. This caused the following
>     changes:
>
>     Change Log:
>     Revert deletion that snuck in to 4794.  Sorry.
>
>     Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com
>     <mailto:mylesgw at gmail.com>>
>     Acked-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com <mailto:mylesgw at gmail.com>>
>
>
>     Build Log:
>     Compilation of a-trend:atc-6220 has been fixed
>     ...
>     Compilation of amd:db800 is still broken
>     See the error log at
>     http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=db800&vendor=amd&num=2
>     <http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=db800&vendor=amd&num=2>
>     ...
>     Compilation of digitallogic:msm800sev is still broken
>     See the error log at
>     http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=msm800sev&vendor=digitallogic&num=2
>     <http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=4795&device=msm800sev&vendor=digitallogic&num=2>
>
> These boards build for me and have 64K left in the ROM.  How can there
> be that big of a difference between my build system and this one?

Maybe you build them without payloads? 64k sounds quite tight for two
payloads, even though it's "just" an old filo...

> Anybody know why they have 128K bootblocks?  It seems a little large.

Can we reduce that? Patrick?


Stefan