[coreboot] fallback/normal support [PATCH]Remove non-CBFS

Peter Stuge peter at stuge.se
Sat Oct 3 20:03:25 CEST 2009


Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> >> IMHO access to CMOS before CAR is unnecessarily painful
> >
> > Why?
> 
> Because you either introduce a dependency on ROMCC or you need
> additional assembler code.

I love Patrick's idea about generating macros from cmos.layout. With
that, the additional assembler code would amount to maybe 15
instructions. Far from painful to me.


//Peter




More information about the coreboot mailing list