[coreboot] fallback/normal support [PATCH]Remove non-CBFS

Peter Stuge peter at stuge.se
Sat Oct 3 20:03:25 CEST 2009

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> >> IMHO access to CMOS before CAR is unnecessarily painful
> >
> > Why?
> Because you either introduce a dependency on ROMCC or you need
> additional assembler code.

I love Patrick's idea about generating macros from cmos.layout. With
that, the additional assembler code would amount to maybe 15
instructions. Far from painful to me.


More information about the coreboot mailing list