[coreboot] [PATCH]clean up bootblocksize handling in cbfstool, kconfig
patrick.georgi at coresystems.de
Thu Nov 12 19:39:53 CET 2009
Am 12.11.2009 19:13, schrieb Myles Watson:
> This patch saves 28K on my s2895, and 55K on qemu. Anybody have a
> strong objection to that? Are we trying to have bootblock size be
> constant for each board? Does it mess up future plans for backwards
Having a good automatic way to minimize the bootblock size is very
useful. As for backwards compatibility, what do you mean - updates? The
bootblock complicates any attempt to do safe updates currently. This
change won't improve it, but it won't make it worse.
> It uses an alignment of 256 bytes. Is that sufficient? Is it necessary?
Should be fine.
My only issue is that I don't know if its behaviour is stable. ld
prefers to work from bottom to top in the address space and this
solution might interfere.
How can we get an "official" statement if this method is supported or
just luck that it works right now? A mail to the binutils list?
More information about the coreboot