[coreboot] proposed cbfs change for 'unitialized' flash

Peter Stuge peter at stuge.se
Sun May 17 00:49:21 CEST 2009

ron minnich wrote:
> At the same time, "erased" value has been "1" on every EEPROM or
> FLASH I've used for some time now. Making this a settable value may
> not be that useful and could cause trouble.

Doesn't matter much to me. It's in a single place so hardcoding would
be fine too.


More information about the coreboot mailing list