[coreboot] write/verify bug
Paul Fox
pgf at foxharp.boston.ma.us
Fri Jun 12 01:41:00 CEST 2009
ron wrote:
> Boy, this discussion is getting really complicated. That's a sign that
> it is time to STOP! and think it all over :-)
in my defense, i thought i had. :-)
>
> We're going to guess the order of operations based on arguments,
> except when we ignore the argument order of operations, because we
> think we're smarter than the user? And then we're going to reread the
> file and ....
>
> I'm an old unix buzzard. Our philosophy was, processes are cheap.
> That's why things like ls | grep are deemed acceptable.
we also often create convenience options for ourselves, like
the 'z' option to tar. but i take your point.
> Tools do one thing (or one thing at a time) and do it well. flashrom
> is getting radically over-engineered.
>
> Please rethink this.
>
> flashrom -e -- erase
> flashrom -r -- read
> flashrom -w -- write
> flashrom -v -- verify
>
> flashrom -any combination -- mistake
>
> Otherwise, no matter how you set this up, you're going to violate
> somebody's principle of least surprise. This thread already shows how.
i gues i didn't see that much controversy here. the only real
surprise i've seen was mine, first at having my chip cleared
instead of programmed :-), and then when folks pointed out
flashrom's erase-by-default behavior (i.e., erase even without
-E). but try as i might, i can't imagine anyone wanting to
_regularly_ perform the steps of erase, write, and verify in any
other order than that one.
if the consensus is that flashrom do only one thing at a time,
that's fine by me. the current behavior is wrong, and needs to
be fixed, somehow.
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 55.4 degrees)
More information about the coreboot
mailing list