[coreboot] domain vs device statictree order

[ron minnich]

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I guess it's not really breadth first.  It's just parents before siblings.
>>>
>>> I think this should be done for all the phases unless there's some
>>> compelling reason not to.
>>
>> I don't think having different phases run in different order is a good
>> idea, as it can lead to unexpected code execution orders all over again.
>
> I agree.
>
>> Code-wise this looks good if all phases act the same way.
>
> Without this patch Phase1, Phase2, and Phase6 are done in statictree
> order, and Phase3, Phase4, and Phase5 are done Parents before
> children.
>
> I don't see Phase1 being used anywhere.  Phase2 is handled with the
> patch.  I think Phase6 should be updated, and I can send a patch.
>
> Ron?
>

I am still sort of out but you guys are on the right approach, do what
you think best. I trust you ...

ron